Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts

Friday, 6 September 2013

Creedal Christian: Verna Dozier on the Old and New Testaments

"If you think the God of the Old Testament is a God of wrath, then you don't know the prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah. If you think the God of the New Testament is a God of sweetness and light, then you don't know Jesus of Nazareth." 
Creedal Christian: Verna Dozier on the Old and New Testaments

O, yes :-)

Thursday, 15 July 2010

Glad

Glad to be sitting with my coffee a little while ago, my grandchildren playing at my feet. Good. Psalm 104 this morning. Speaking of gladness, God's goodness
brings forth food from the earth and wine to gladden the heart of man (Ps 104.14)
…a very pleasant Biblical truth. And while I'm on that subject, here's why I like the English Standard Version so much:
The ESV is founded on the conviction that the words of the Bible are the very words of God. And because the words themselves—not just the thoughts or ideas—are inspired by God, each word must be translated with the greatest precision and accuracy.  As Jesus Himself stressed, "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God" (Mat 4.4). 
This passion for God's Word is the driving force behind the translation of the ESV™ Bible. The English Standard Version™ does not try to "improve" on the original in the light of today's culture or by using trendy language. Instead, the utmost care has been taken to express God's Word in English that most closely captures the meaning of the original, with understandability, beauty, and impact.  
…from "About the English Standard Version" in the excellent Logos Bible Software 4.

After all, Jesus says, "Your word is truth" (John 17.17) and St Paul writes, "the truth is in Jesus" (Eph 4.21). I'm glad of that.

Friday, 20 November 2009

Home Again and a Little Crusty Kierkegaard…

…after a refreshing clergy retreat and leading some worship in song at Women's Aglow Medicine Hat Candlelight last night. Faithful women.

Came across the following vintage crusty Kierkegaard a couple of times in the last few days:
The matter is quite simple. The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand, we are obliged to act accordingly. Take any words in the New Testament and forget everything except pledging yourself to act accordingly. My God, you will say, if I do that my whole life will be ruined. How would I ever get on in the world? Herein lies the real place of Christian scholarship. Christian scholarship is the Church’s prodigious invention to defend itself against the Bible, to ensure that we can continue to be good Christians without the Bible coming too close. Oh, priceless scholarship, what would we do without you? Dreadful it is to fall into the hands of the living God. Yes it is even dreadful to be alone with the New Testament.
Ooo, er.

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

Kathleen Norris on the Power of Scripture

Have just finished Kathleen Norris' Acedia & Me: A Marriage, Monks, and A Writer’s Life (Riverhead Books, 2008). It is up to her usual impressive standard. Here's something that caught my eye about the power of Scripture:
Perhaps the most radical aspect of the psychology of the desert monastics is the extent to which they believed that Scripture itself had the power to heal. In The Word in the Desert, his study of how thoroughly the early monks integrated Scripture into their lives, Douglas Burton-Christie notes that they regarded these “sacred texts [as] inherently powerful, a source of holiness, with a capacity to transform their lives.” 141


Friday, 21 August 2009

Christ the Lord: the Road to Cana and Swordplay

Christ the Lord: the Road to Cana
Still enjoying the afterglow of Anne Rice’, Christ the Lord: the Road to Cana. I feel like, through her, the Lord gave me some idea of what might have been going on in his head in those early days as he struggled to comprehend and accept the reality of who he really was. I loved him as I read it. I was brought to tears as John baptized him in the Jordan. Rice’s imaginative take on the wedding at Cana and how Jesus came to be there is brilliant. Wonderful.
Kingdom Swordplay
Camping in Psalm 18 this week with A Guide to Prayer. It’s the “by my God I can leap over a wall” psalm. “He trains my hands for war (v32),” writes David. “I pursued my enemies and overtook them (v37)…I thrust them through, so that they were not able to rise; they fell under my feet (v38).” I can’t imagine thrusting someone through with a sword. David’s world was also one in which what he was called to do exposed him to the risk of being thrust through himself. It’s foreign to me except in some sort of allegorical, “spiritual warfare” kind of way, not to mention being seriously incorrect politically.

Still, it is God’s upright and true Word of Life.

Jesus has something to say about swords:
Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. (Mt 10.34)
and
But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one. (Lk 22.36)
But on the other hand,
Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword. (Mt 26.52)
What Are My Hands Trained For?
How does one apply that to life and ministry in twenty-first century Medicine Hat? What have You—do You—train my hands for? Who, or what, must I (figuratively, I presume, I hope!) pursue, overtake and thrust through so they are unable to rise and will fall beneath my feet?

Saturday, 24 January 2009

A Lovely Description of the Bible

I'm reading Adam Nicolson, God's Secretaries: the making of the King James Bible. I love this sentence on the Bible:
It was the word of God, an enormous, direct, vastly complicated, infinitely interpretable account of what God meant by and for his creation. 122
Sums it up pretty well.

And to think those secretaries were essentially Anglican. Hadn't thought of that before.

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

On Why Woman Was Made For Man (Intellectuelle)

I keep an eye on Intellectuelle via Google Reader. Thoughtful, indeed. Consider this:
woman was made for man not because she needed him, but because he needed her. (I think she does need him, but that's not why she was made.)

Both man and woman were made that they might look to one another, but first to God. If man depends upon woman to the exclusion of God, then trouble results. If woman depends upon man to the exclusion of God, then trouble results. 
Some wisdom going on over there. Thanks Bonnie.

Friday, 25 July 2008

Grudem on Fasting and Angels

The reading continues, with a hospital visit and a marriage prep session thrown in.

On Prayer

My favorite in this chapter is the piece on fasting—something I and the people of StB have to get into.
several benefits come from fasting, all of which affect our relationship with God:
  1. Fasting increases our sense of humility and dependence on the Lord (for our hunger and physical weakness continually remind us how are not really strong in ourselves but need the Lord).

  2. Fasting allows us to give more attention to prayer (for we are not spending our time eating), and

  3. It is a continual reminder that, just as we sacrifice some personal comfort to the Lord by not eating, so we must continually sacrifice all of ourselves to him. Moreover, 

  4. Fasting is a good exercise in self-discipline, for as we refrain from eating food which we would ordinarily desire, it also strengthens our ability to refrain from sin, to which we might otherwise be tempted to yield. If we train ourselves to accept the small “suffering” of fasting willingly, we will be better able to accept other suffering for the sake of righteousness (cf. Heb 5.8, 1 Peter 4.1-2),

  5. Fasting also heightens spiritual and mental alertness and a sense of god’s presence as we focus less on the material things of this world (such as food) and as the energies of our body are freed from digesting and processing food. This enables us to focus on eternal spiritual realities that are much more important. Finally, 

  6. Fasting expresses earnestness and urgency in our prayers: if we continued to fast, eventually we would die. Therefore, in a symbolic way, fasting says to God that we are prepared to lay down our lives that the situation be changed rather than that it continue. In this sense fasting is especially appropriate when the spiritual state of the church is low. 390-391
I hate fasting, but it's getting down to the wire, folks. Time to get serious.

On Angels

Angels are created, spiritual beings with moral judgment and high intelligence, but without physical bodies. 397

…ordinary activities…guarding and protecting us (Ps 34.7, 91.11, Heb 1.14), and joining with us in worship to God (Heb 12.22), they are invisible. 397

…angels are never said to be made in "the image of God." 402

Though we are "for a little while lower than the angels" (Heb 2.7), when our salvation is complete we will be exalted above angels and rule over them. 402
Satan and Demons next.

My Grudem Exploration Continues

396 pages in. Enjoying myself.

Chapter 16: God's Providence

A definition:
God is continually involved with all created things in such a way that he (1) keeps them existing and maintaining the properties with which he created them; (2) cooperates with created things in every action, directing their distinctive properties to cause them to act as they do; and (3) directs them to fulfill his purposes. 315
He then goes on to unpack that very thoroughly from a Calvinist perspective including a lengthy discussion of how God can be in control and we humans have free choice at the same time.
God causes all things that happen, but…he does so in such a way that he somehow upholds our ability to make willing, responsible choices, choices that have real and eternal results, and for which we are held accountable. Exactly how God combines his providential control with our willing and significant choices, Scripture does not explain to us. But rather than deny one aspect or the other (simply because we cannot explain how both can be true), we should accept both in an attempt to be faithful to the teaching of all of Scripture. 321
The Problem of Evil
What Scripture reveals to us, …was that God was bringing about his plan through the willing choices of real human beings who were morally accountable for their actions. In a way not understood by us and not revealed to us, God caused them to make a willing choice to do what they did. 326
Here Grudem's section headings in one part of the discussion:
Analysis of Verses Relating to God and Evil.
  • God Uses All things to Fulfill His Purposes and Even Uses Evil for His Glory and for Our Good

  • Nevertheless, God Never Does Evil, and Is Never to Be Blamed for Evil

  • God rightfully Blames and Judges Moral Creatures for the Evil They Do

  • Evil Is Real, Not an Illusion, and We Should Never Do Evil, for It Will Always Harm Us and Others

  • In Spite of All of the Foregoing Statements, We Have to Come to the Point Where We Confess That We Do Not Understand How It Is That God Can Ordain That We Carry Out Evil Deeds and Yet Hold Us Accountable for Them and Not be Blamed Himself
Furthermore,
Because of our confidence in God’s providential care, we need not fear any evil or harm, even if it does come to us—it can only come by God’s will and ultimately for our own good. 337
The Arminian Position

He then compares and contrasts the Arminian position regarding God's Providence. I was intrigued to find that Methodists, Nazarenes and Assemblies of God tend to be Arminian. The 39 Articles put us Anglicans in the Reformed, or Calvinist, camp. Here's how he describes the Arminian position:
Those who hold an Arminian position maintain that in order to preserve the real human freedom and real human choices that are necessary for genuine human person-hood, God cannot cause or plan our voluntary choices. Therefore they conclude that God’s providential involvement in or control of history must not include every specific detail of every event that happens, but that God instead simply responds to human choices and actions as they come about and does so in such a way that his purposes are ultimately accomplished in the world. 338
In other words, Arminians believe God does not control every detail of our lives while Calvinists believe that He does even though we also are free to make our own choices.

Thursday, 24 July 2008

More Grudem on Creation

Grudem's chapter on Creation is a very helpful, engaging and even-handed exploration of the various theories concerning this thorny issue. Some statements that caught my eye:

On "The Relationship Between Scripture and the Findings of Modern Science

We can learn from such controversies as Galileo and the earth travelling around the sun:
…careful observation of the natural world can cause us to go back to Scripture and reexamime whether Scripture actually teaches what we think it teaches. Sometimes, on closer examination of the text, we may find that our previous interpretations were incorrect. 273

On "When All the Facts Are Rightly Understood, There Will Be "No Final Conflict" Between Scripture and Natural Science"

We should not fear to investigate scientifically the facts of the created world but should do so eagerly and with complete honesty, confident that when facts are rightly understood, they will always turn out to be consistent with God's inerrant words in Scripture. Similarly, we should approach the study of Scripture eagerly and with confidence that, when rightly understood, Scripture will never contradict facts in the natural world. 275

On "The Need for Further Understanding"

Then, after a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of Darwinian evolutionary theory, old and young earth theories, he writes:
Scripture seems to be more easily understood to suggest (but not to require) a young earth view, while the observable facts of creation seem increasingly to favour an old earth view. Both views are possible, but neither is certain. 308

I Laughed Out Loud: Grudem on Creation

…while reading Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology! This made me do it:
Instead of the straightforward biblical account of God's creation, the theistic evolution view has to understand events to have occurred something like this:
And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds." And after three hundred eigthy-seven million four hundred ninety-two thousand eight hundred seventy-one attempts, God finally made a mouse that worked. 276-277
This in the fascinating Chapter 15, on Creation, and a section entitled, "Some Theories About Creation Seem Clearly Inconsistent With the Teachings of Scripture," one of those theories being "Theistic Evolution."

Grudem thinks that there is an incompatibility between God's purposefulness in the biblical account of creation and the randomness demanded by evolutionary theory.

No kidding!

Gleanings from a Study Week with Wayne Grudem's "Systematic Theology"

I'm supposed to take a couple of study weeks a year. This year I decided to take one to read Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Zondervan, 1994). I chose this book because it has been recommended by some people I admire, because I'm intrigued by the fact that someone described Grudem as the Vineyard's official theologian ( I find the idea of a charismatic systematic theology appealling) and because it is a serious work worthy of study.

Yesterday I read the first 260 pages which covered Part 1: The Doctrine of the Word of God and half of Part 2: The Doctrine of God. Here are some things that caught my eye (the numbers at the end of each paragraph are page numbers):

The Christian Liberal-Conservative Debate

First, an insight on why dialogue between liberal and conservative Christians is so difficult:
I do not think a true system of theology can be constructed from within what we may call the “liberal” theological tradition—that is, by people who deny the absolute truthfulness of the Bible, or who do not think the words of the Bible to be God’s very words. 17

This does not mean that those in the liberal tradition have nothing valuable to say; it simply means that differences with them almost always boil down to differences over the nature of the Bible and its authority. 17
…which is the exact situation in which we Anglicans find ourselves these days.

On understanding Scripture properly

…when we are unable to understand some passage or some doctrine of Scripture,…pray for God’s help. Often what we need is not more data but more insight into the data we already have available. 33

…our ability to reason and draw conclusions is not the ultimate standard of truth—only Scripture is. 34
On the Authority of Scripture

A definition:
The authority of Scripture means that all the words in Scripture are God’s words in such a way that to disbelieve or disobey any word of Scripture is to disbelieve or disobey God. 73

It is helpful for us to learn that the Bible is historically accurate, that it is internally consistent that it contains prophecies that have been fulfilled hundreds of years later, that it has influenced the course of human history more than any other book, that it has continued changing the lives of millions of individuals throughout its history, that through it people come to find salvation, that it has a majestic beauty and a profound depth of teaching unmatched by any other book, and that it claims hundreds of times over to be God’s very words. 78

On the Truthfulness of Scripture:


  • God Cannot Lie or Speak Falsely

  • Therefore All the Words in Scripture Are Completely True and Without Error in Any Part

  • God’s Words are the Ultimate Standard of Truth
And, based on John 17.17, "“Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth,” because “truth” here is a noun, not an adjective:
The Bible is God’s Word, and God’s Word is the ultimate definition of what is true and what is not true: God’s Word is itself truth. Thus we are to think of the Bible as the ultimate standard of truth, the reference point by which every other claim to truthfulness is to be measured. Those assertions that conform with Scripture are “true” while those that do not conform with Scripture are not true.

What then is truth? Truth is what God says, and we have what God says (accurately but not exhaustively) in the Bible. 83
On the Inerrancy of Scripture

Grudem shares his idea of inerrancy with the likes of JI Packer. A definition and some comments:
The inerrancy of Scripture means that Scripture in the original manuscripts does not affirm anything that is contrary to fact. 90

This definition does not mean that the Bible tells us every fact there is to know about any one subject, but it affirms that what it does say about any subject is true. 91

…biblical statements can be imprecise and still be totally true. Inerrancy has to do with truthfulness, not with the degree of precision with which events are reported. 91-92

On the Sufficiency of Scripture

…although the history of the church may help us to understand what God says to us in the Bible, never in church history had God added to the teachings or commands of Scripture: Nowhere in church history outside of Scripture has God added anything that he requires us to believe or to do. 129

…everything God wants to tell us about … [any] question is to be found in Scripture. 130-131

How Reading Grudem Makes Me Feel

This approach fits for me. I like the way Grudem does not avoid the hard questions and the things that don't seem to make sense in the Bible.

Billy Graham describes a day he decided to believe that the Bible is, indeed, God's very word. I, too, have so decided. Rather than calling the veracity of the Bible into question because I don't understand a passage, or because I don't agree with what God said or did, I will pray for more Holy Spirit insight. I choose to believe that God, in His grace and mercy, has provided me with all that I need in Scripture (accurately but not necessarily exhaustively, as Grudem put it) to live best as a follower of Jesus.

Monday, 18 February 2008

Jeremiah: Liver of Life to the Full

On Being a Public Menace

I'm enjoying reading Jeremiah in my St James Daily Devotional Guide lectionary at the moment.

In his introduction to Jeremiah, the guide's compiler and writer, Patrick Henry Reardon writes:
Most of Jerusalem's citizens, suffering from chronic shallowness and terminal optimism, thought him something of an oddity and a nuisance, maybe even a public menace.
These days I, too, feel like a bit of an oddity and a nuisance in the Anglican church because of my conservative views. I'm not sure how menacing I appear.

In the last few days, as I've watched the ANiC parishes making their bids for freedom from the revisionist tide, am reminded of something a brother priest once said -- it must have been a dozen years ago (have we really been stuggling with this that long?) -- when we were talking about where we would draw the line beyond which we could not stay with the ACoC.

"Jeremiah didn't leave," he said.

Nor he did. I've never forgotten it. It's one of the reasons I am where I am.

One Hell of a Way to Get Your Blood Going in the Morning

Jeremiah has always connected with me for some reason. I have many of his verses copied out in my journal over the years. Back in 1997 I read Kathleen Norris’, The Cloister Walk (New York: Riverhead Books, 1996), in which she wrote some tasty things about Jeremiah. For example:
Listening to Jeremiah is one hell of a way to get your blood going in the morning; it puts caffeine to shame. 31
[A monk said] he was glad to be reading Jeremiah in the morning, and not at evening prayer, when there are more likely to be guests. “The monks can take it,” he said, “but most people have no idea what’s in the Bible, and they come unglued.” 34
A prophet’s task is to reveal the fault lines hidden beneath the comfortable surface of the worlds we invent for ourselves, the national myths as well as the little lies and delusions of control and security that get us through the day. And Jeremiah does this better than anyone. 34

Running with the Horses

And then there is the amazing (St) Eugene Peterson and his Run with the Horses: The Quest for Life at Its Best (Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 1983), about Jeremiah as a life-to-the-full liver.
There is a memorable passage concerning Jeremiah’s life when, worn down by the opposition and absorbed in self-pity, he was about to capitulate to just a premature death [the kind of death after which we go on living for many years]. He was ready to abandon his unique calling in God and settle for being a Jerusalem statistic. At that critical moment he heard the reprimand: “If you have raced with men on foot, and they have wearied you, how will you compete with horses? And if in a safe land you fall down, how will you do in the jungle of the Jordan?”(Jer 12.5). ...
Life is difficult, Jeremiah. Are you going to quit at the first wave of opposition? Are you going to retreat when you find that there is more to life than finding three meals a day and a dry place to sleep at night? Are you going to run home the minute you find that the mass of men and women are more interested in keeping their feet warm than living at risk to the glory of God? Are you going to live cautiously or courageously? I called you to live at your best, to pursue righteousness, to sustain a drive toward excellence. It is easier, I know, to be neurotic. It is easier to be parasitic. It is easier to relax in the embracing arms of The Average. Easier, but not better. Easier, but not more significant. Easier, but not more fulfilling. I called you to a life of purpose far beyond what you think yourself capable of living and promised you adequate strength to fulfill your destiny. Now at the first sign of difficulty you are ready to quit. If you are fatigued by this run-of-the-mill crowd of apathetic mediocrities, what will you do when the real race starts, the race with the swift and determined horses fo excellence? What is it you really want, Jeremiah, do you want to shuffle along with this crowd, or run with the horses? 17-18
Peterson finishes his wonderful book by describing Jeremiah’s life as “a towering life terrifically lived.” What an epitaph. A lovely book.

A Purpose Far Beyond

My life doesn't feel particularly "towering" in these revisionist days. But I do feel that I am, indeed, called to a life of purpose far beyond what I think myself capable of living.

By the way, I never learned to ride real horses. They seem way too high for me. Sigh.

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

A Jeremiah Prayer Point

Jeremiah chapter 6, verse 16, was my prayer for my family, God-children and all the people and church leaders in our bulletin intercession list, Archbishop Venables in the Anglican Cycle of Prayer, the SOMA and ANiC lists this morning...
Thus says the LORD: "Stand by the roads and look, and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is; and walk in it, and find rest for your souls."
O yes! to that, but the verse goes on...
But they said, "We will not walk in it."
LORD, in your mercy, may that not be true.

What might the "ancient paths" be for us? I'm thinking of the ways of the Bible and the Prayer Book, the 39 Articles and the Solemn Declaration. Hopelessly reactionary and old-fashioned, I know. Sigh.

Monday, 17 September 2007

Of Genealogies, Women and Men

I'm reading the genealogies (all nine chapters of them) in 1 Chronicles in my St James Daily Devotional Guide lectionary. I am fascinated by the little tid-bits of information that are included. There are lists of names, sons of, sons of, fathered and then these little promontories in the genealogical landscape:
  • Nimrod who "was the first on earth to be a mighty man"

  • Casluhim "from whom the Philistines came"

  • Peleg "for in his days the earth was divided"...the footnote tells us the name "Peleg" means division
There are also the women. One pops up every now and then.
  • in verse 32, the first woman mentioned: Keturah, Abraham's concubine. I wonder why not Sarah or Hagar?

  • in verse 39, we are told “and Lotan's sister is Timna.” She is also mentioned in Genesis in a list of Esau's descendants. Why are no other sisters mentioned? What was special about her? Who needed to know that?

  • in verse 50, the writer makes a point of naming Mehetabel, who was the wife of one of the kings of Edom, Hadad, and who was also “the daughter of Matred, the daughter of Mezahab.” I wonder whether Matred and Mezahab are male or female? Why is Mehetabel listed when none of the other kings' wives are?
Fascinating, I thought, maybe I'll start making a list of all the women who are mentioned in the Bible. But wait! Somebody has probably already done it and posted it on the web. And so they have. There I found that there are 188 women mentioned in the Bible. I guess God thinks that is enough. If what women say is true about any woman being able to do the work of ten men, then that would be enough, wouldn't it. See the list of women here.

As I have to remind myself in this church business, it's not quantity that counts, it's quality. Thank God for you women.

Friday, 7 September 2007

On Biblical Inerrancy

I've started reading Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. In it I find a compelling case for biblical inerrancy.

I also found reference to THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY. He had also referred to this in one of his talks to which I have referred below. More on the The Chicago Statement here.

Interestingly, well-known Anglican theologian, J. I. Packer was one of the people involved in developing the statement, as were Francis Schaeffer and R. C. Sproul.

Sadly, my denomination has lost its way in this area. Our methods of deciding what is, or is not, permissible and faithful to the teaching of Scripture, are such that, as the Chicago Statement states,
the Bible that God gave loses its authority, and what has authority instead is a Bible reduced in content according to the demands of one's critical reasoning and in principle reducible still further once one has started. This means that at bottom independent reason now has authority, as opposed to Scriptural teaching.

Read the whole statement here.

Wednesday, 5 September 2007

A Survey of the New Testament 3:16s

John 3.16 is the big one, of course. On a whim one day I decided to check all the New Testament 3.16s out. There are 21 of them.

Matthew
And when Jesus was baptized, immediately he went up from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened to him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and coming to rest on him;

Mark
He appointed the twelve:

Luke
John answered them all, saying, “I baptize you with water, but he who is mightier than I is coming, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.

John
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

Acts
And his name—by faith in his name—has made this man strong whom you see and know, and the faith that is through Jesus has given the man this perfect health in the presence of you all.

Romans
in their paths are ruin and misery

1 Corinthians
Do you not know that you are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in you?

2 Corinthians
But when one turns to the Lord, the veil is removed.

Galatians
Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, “And to offsprings,” referring to many, but referring to one, “And to your offspring,” who is Christ.

Ephesians
that according to the riches of his glory he may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in your inner being

Philippians
Only let us hold true to what we have attained.

Colossians
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.

2 Thessalonians
Now may the Lord of peace himself give you peace at all times in every way. The Lord be with you all.

1 Timothy
Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.

2 Timothy
All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness

Hebrews
For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses?

James
For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice.

1 Peter
yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame.

2 Peter
as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.

1 John
By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.

Revelation
So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.

An interesting combination.

Thursday, 23 August 2007

Reading and Listening: Goodies from Stephen Carter, Dallas Willard and Wayne Grudem

I have discovered a new writer! Stephen L Carter, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Yale, no less. I'm reading The Emperor of Ocean Park. His first novel, a "complex and smart mystery," they say, and a first-class read. One of his characters makes this observation in passing about the Episcopal Church:
You know us Episcopalians, ... We love to feel compassion for people. We're never happy unless we're ignoring somebody's sins to show how tolerant we are. (p135)
This is not what the book is about. I just noticed it because of all the hoo-ha we Anglicans are experiencing these days and because some Canadian Anglicans, especially of the Member-of-General-Synod variety, seem to have caught the same bug.

Thank God for MP3. I listened to Dallas Willard speaking at a Church Staff Retreat as I treadmilled recently. Some things he said which I had to write down as I trod:
When anger comes up in our standing for truth, then it's about winning not truth.

Disciplines are about cultivating grace.

God never gives anyone too much to do.

Paradise is already in session. We're already in eternity.

Work a modest day, step back and rest and you will be close to God.
He also spoke of life being a proper balance of family, rest, prayer, meditation and flower-sniffing. He said the disciplines to which he feels particularly called are fasting and memorizing Scripture. Also, on enough stuff:
We will trust Jesus for forgiveness of sins but not for the next sandwich.
Last but not least, from his Scottsdale Bible Church teachings, Wayne Grudem on inerrancy:
What the Bible says about any subject is true.

Inerrancy is to do with truthfulness not precision concerning events and when they happened.
He says each of us need to be reading the Bible, praying and walking with the LORD, otherwise we're starving ourselves spiritually.

Thursday, 2 March 2006

A Bible Bit

We have discovered a way of studying the Bible in which we learn everything about it except what it says. (John Rodgers of Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry)
And we have also discovered a way of interpreting the Bible which enables us to avoid doing what it says, especially with regard to sexuality, money and evangelism.

Lord, have mercy.